OPINION
Bureaucratic Supervision 2021
The governance of our public sector has been marked by a “triple gap” for years. A sound policy is one thing, while implementation can be another.
![https://assetd.kompas.id/K83YJuUKpJXx2r09YYR-8H4EYdo=/1024x1018/https%3A%2F%2Fkompas.id%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2021%2F03%2F20210305-Opini-6_Pengawasan-Birokrasi-2021_1614955042.jpg](https://assetd.kompas.id/K83YJuUKpJXx2r09YYR-8H4EYdo=/1024x1018/https%3A%2F%2Fkompas.id%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2021%2F03%2F20210305-Opini-6_Pengawasan-Birokrasi-2021_1614955042.jpg)
The governance of our public sector has been marked by a “triple gap” for years. A sound policy is one thing, while implementation can be another. And, what\'s more, there is another issue related to law enforcement or administrative supervision on the field.
Regarding the third “gap”, generally the bureaucrats at the central and regional levels still underestimate the role of supervision. Some parties are often “allergic” to oversight. They don\'t want to be supervised. If possible, they try to outsmart, even "flirt" with the oversight agencies, such as the inspectorate, external supervisory commission or the financial audit body.
Versi cetak artikel ini terbit di harian Kompas edisi di halaman 6 dengan judul "Pengawasan Birokrasi 2021".
Baca Epaper Kompas